[ Rejected ] Rewop

[2kcastle]

1. Why do you want to join us?
* Because you described your alliance as a democratic alliance which discusses situations and then goes with the majority decision.
----------
2. If applicable why do you want to leave your current alliance?
* I'm not part of any alliance right now.
----------
3. What is your IK history; List of Wars, Friends and Enemies.
* I didn't participate in any war.
* Good friends: Kladnik, ichibod, isaphrael
* I don't have any enemies.
----------
4. How would you describe yourself as a player, What are your traits, both good and bad?
* I'm more of a defensive player, I don't take active islands without a reason.
* I fight back hard if I am attacked or my friends need help.
----------
5. How much experience do you have of playing Inselkampf?
* This is my first time playing IK, I didn't play on any other servers.
* But I know how to trade, farm, colonize...If that is what you have in mind.
----------
6. How would you briefly describe yourself as a person: Age, Gender, Native Language, Hobbies, Education, Lifesituation and so on.
* Male
* games: CS:S, inselkampf
----------
7. Describe your current technical situation in the game. Isles, Fleets, Garrisons, which Ocean you are in etc.
* Isles:
001 (41:18:18)
002 (41:10:7)
* Fleets
LWS 37
SMS 31
* Army
ST 351
SF 805 (at the moment, I'm building them non-stop)
Cats 3
----------
8. What were your best and worst moments in the world of Inselkampf?
* Worst: Slowly getting my resources to level 20 on my first island.
* Best: Colonizing a second island.
----------
9. What is you opinion of multis and scripters?
* I don't think thats fair-play.
----------
10. Regarding pacts and peace treaties, what do you understand by those terms?
* Peace treaty: not engaging a war with an alliance
* Pact: helping an alliance when help is needed
----------
11. Are you aware that Morkin, and therefore FoM, are rather peaceful alliances not actively seeking domination or war.
* Yes, I am aware of that.
----------
12. Please note anything which you feel might support your application to FoM.
* I'm quite active.
* I would participate in forums (IK and web)
----------
13. Finally (thank god I hear you cry), are you currently in any wars/squabbles with other players? What combat have you been involved in on this server?

* Currently I'm not in any wars with other players.

[DrieZ/Cesium]

He seems OK to me..
I might say yes

[2kcastle]

although ive go tnothing against him personally im going to have to say no.
We've turned down kladnik for having small fleets and troop counts so i have to say no to rewop as well for the same reason.

[intchanter]

Looks good.

Yes.

[intchanter]

2kcastle said:

although ive go tnothing against him personally im going to have to say no.
We've turned down kladnik for having small fleets and troop counts so i have to say no to rewop as well for the same reason.

Considering his user ID is higher than mine, he doesn't look too bad on those counts, and they're getting better.

I may be a bit biased today, though, because I'm wearing a t-shirt from thinkgeek.com that reads:

esrever
reenigne

[Arminius]

I think we ought to set out some minimum standards in terms of points/islands/fleets etc. Otherwise, why would we reject a newcomer with a 1pt isle who is literate and mature? Of course no army or fleet, but he'll have one later for sure.

I'm just a bit concerned that we're taking on board too many weak members (even if they will be stronger later on) who could not usefully contribute in any military action in the near future.

[AeroS]

no
EDIT: after seeing arminius's response I would also like to say that I am interested in a defined standard. I would also like to see a set of levels where our standards increase as our membership gets closer to our maximum allowed members.
A list of expectations for present members and a written process for kicking someone out who is not meeting those expectations.

[kae]

I know I got in on a bit of grace (although I'd like to think I can hold my own too), but my grief is that he didn't tell anything about who he is. He's male, and he's played Counter Strike (after playing that game for 3 years, I'm not so sure that's a check mark in the 'for' category!).

While he can fill out a questionnaire. Who is he?

And I'm all for the 'expectations.'

[blazed]

no, seems just like most other applications we deny, good - but not quite there

[Sol]

No.

He seems like a nice player, but he is simply not strong enough. If we ever go to war, would be be able to defend himself and support his alliance? I think not.

[Cesium]

I suggest we put a basic standard up on our front page, but keep a more precise list of checks and balances to ourselves in the even that somebody might lie about their fleetcounts.

[bishop]

No, he seems a bit nondescript. There's nothing in his application that makes me particularly want to have him on board.