Action: taking down Dr_eam/Menachem

[Arminius]

Void
2 minutes ago
hello
Hello i am informinmg you on an idea that has been agreed on by an admin and a number of members of angel.

Dr_eam and mecanem have attacked a number of our members and members of our allies and we beleive it is time to bring them down.
if your alliance is ok with this please send me back a list of who is willing to help because angel cannot do this by our selves.we are informing all of our alies and we hope they will help otherwise these attackers will grow out of our reach and we will never be able to stop them.

NOTE: this is only a suggestion so we will see what yoiur alliance think and could you get back to us ASAP thank you

p.s valhru have already said they will join in

Can we verify that? Any opinions?

[eproxy]

It worries me that Angel cannot deal with this themselves, they also made a somewhat major error in spelling Menachem. If it wasn't for your thread title it would have taken me a while to guess who they were reffering to.

If Valheru join in this battle and they already have two members of [-S-] to battle (apparently) they may be biting off more than they can chew.

It should also be noted that Menachem lies far away from any of our forces. Dr_eam on the other hand is well within striking distance of andre, Freiegeister and Matija (all Morkin). All three of which together could certainly overpower him.

[Shendemiar]

Arminius, is that message to you or a quote?

I must say im strongly against this. I can see it would easily end up us doing all the work.

[Arminius]

It was a message to me. I ask whether we can verify this, as it's so poorly written, and I was expecting something better from a serious diplomat. Well, void is an admiral. But still, I'm not convinced. There's so many people around spreading rumours and trying to get people to fight each other...

[Harlequin]

Wait and watch I say

[Shendemiar]

arminius said:

It was a message to me. I ask whether we can verify this, as it's so poorly written, and I was expecting something better from a serious diplomat. Well, void is an admiral. But still, I'm not convinced. There's so many people around spreading rumours and trying to get people to fight each other...

I concur its a bad message. Its missing all the basics... Spelt wrong and doesnt say why they should be taken down etc...

[Natmus]

It shouldn't be taken as the standard of Angel members anymore. I think void is out on an errand of his own. The Angel admins are currently hunting multis and spies in cooperation with a few Orcs.

[Arminius]

That was what I was suspecting...

[eproxy]

Void
2 minutes ago
hello
Hello i am informinmg you on an idea that has been agreed on by an admin and a number of members of angel.

Singular; I didn't see that the first time I read it

Added; more accurately speaking I didn't read that the first time I saw it.

[Pose]

I was under the assumption the info we were receiving from void ( as a player we have a pact with) could be relied upon, and his motives would be inline with our own thinking, if this is not the case should we still have a pact with this rabble?

[Rocklobster]

Why not tell them to do what they think tactically sound, and ask us if they feel overpowered after some fighting perhaps?