Helping Pantheon Split

[Arminius]

pain
18 minutes ago
SNAPS
arminius;okeanos

We are looking to possibly create an alliance called SNAPS, for a few highly battered players that no longer wish to participate, as well as some smaller players to go for refuge. Much the same as digg is doing with NAPS. Is Morkin willing to pact with them to make it a level playing field?

Let me know...thanks.

Opinions? I guess we ought to leave it running until about tomorrow afternoon (3pm GMT) or finish earlier if the result is clear?

[Cesium]

I think we should do unto Pantheon as we would do unto DIGG. No sense in showing favoritism.

[AeroS]

cesium said:

I think we should do unto Pantheon as we would do unto DIGG. No sense in showing favoritism.

I agree.

[2kcastle]

I think we should pact with them but maybe a little diplomatic pressure could be applied to get a different name for their new alliance ?

[digital]

Yes no need in rubbing salt in the wound. A different name would be nice.

[Warliter]

What do you think to announcing to both DIGG & Pantheon, that as they break down in to smaller alliances, we will pact them in pairs for 30 Days.

The idea being we will pact with NAPS until SNAPS is formed, then 30 days after they both exist we will drop this pact to nothing. This way we are no longer tied in beyond a month.

e.g

NAPS is created today, but SNAPS is not created until Monday.

We pact with NAPS today and then Snaps from Monday, but 30 days from Monday we will drop the pact with both these alliances.

we would folow this process with each pair of alliances created. Until the break down is finished

[Arminius]

That's a good idea...

[Arminius]

I think the poll is clear enough... 13:1