Lords Without Armies

Matija
Morkin Member

The Turtle Moves!

Posts: 1,696

Lords Without Armies Dec 12, 2003 14:14:16 GMT

Quote

Post by Matija on Dec 12, 2003 14:14:16 GMT

Too many of those buggers are running around for my taste. So how about this:

A Lord can not transfer all of his soldiers to a garrison or to another lord, he must keep at least 1 / 10 / 100.

But he can still be the lonly survivor of a battle.

Woman: That is a priceless Steinway!
Clouseau: Not anymore.

Old Shendemiar Old Users Status Unknown Yeah Yeah! Posts: 1,631	Lords Without Armies Dec 12, 2003 14:19:32 GMT Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Old Shendemiar on Dec 12, 2003 14:19:32 GMT I think it's not a poblem, and when more sophisticated game-modes are introduced, winning a game is not depended on killing enemy lords.
	I played Lords of Midnight in a tent, with VERY long extension cord, listening to Led Zeppelin performing Stairway to Heaven: "And a new day will dawn for those who stand long"

Ringthane Public Area Guest Ardet nec Consumitur Posts: 5,446	Lords Without Armies Dec 12, 2003 14:23:21 GMT Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Ringthane on Dec 12, 2003 14:23:21 GMT Agree.
	However it only makes sense when you make it do so. Spokesman of the Gods

sparrowhawk Public Area Guest Ook! Posts: 3,160	Lords Without Armies Dec 12, 2003 15:46:59 GMT Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by sparrowhawk on Dec 12, 2003 15:46:59 GMT Hey, I rely on lords without armies! If I can't have my spy network then I'm not playing <sulk>
	If only...

Post by Matija on Dec 12, 2003 14:14:16 GMT

Post by Old Shendemiar on Dec 12, 2003 14:19:32 GMT

Post by Ringthane on Dec 12, 2003 14:23:21 GMT

Post by sparrowhawk on Dec 12, 2003 15:46:59 GMT