Natmus
Morkin Admin
Fight the power!
Posts: 4,518
|
Post by Natmus on Aug 22, 2005 12:46:26 GMT
One of the new-found farms of Avinalaff is a member of [LSD3]. We have a peace treaty with those guys, so I contacted the diplomat of theirs that suggested the peace treaty back then. I wrote: If we can the entire LSD network, things may get interesting.
|
|
Natmus
Morkin Admin
Fight the power!
Posts: 4,518
|
Post by Natmus on Aug 22, 2005 15:14:29 GMT
Arrrgh! LSD3 may have 3 admins and 5 diplomats, but what does it help when none of the is online? I have a feeling the LSD network can whack Avinalaff, but it requires action.
|
|
Matija
Morkin Member
The Turtle Moves!
Posts: 1,696
|
Post by Matija on Aug 22, 2005 16:33:34 GMT
Yes, that is the only way we could maybe bring him down before we get much stronger than we are.
|
|
Ringthane
Public Area Guest
Ardet nec Consumitur
Posts: 5,446
|
Post by Ringthane on Aug 22, 2005 16:33:54 GMT
What if he's farming them under consent...?
|
|
SkulkrinBait
Morkin Admin
Haxx0rs == Suxx0rs! v4
Posts: 6,680
|
Post by SkulkrinBait on Aug 22, 2005 19:16:13 GMT
Fight fight fight!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Perun
Public Area Guest
Issa (Vis) [1:76:24]
Posts: 2,506
|
Post by Perun on Aug 22, 2005 19:22:15 GMT
Just remember: it's very unprobably that big sharks would fight each other because of one small fish.
At least not without very good cause.
|
|
SkulkrinBait
Morkin Admin
Haxx0rs == Suxx0rs! v4
Posts: 6,680
|
Post by SkulkrinBait on Aug 22, 2005 20:07:40 GMT
We're not small fish now, the 98th biggest fish!
|
|
Natmus
Morkin Admin
Fight the power!
Posts: 4,518
|
Post by Natmus on Aug 22, 2005 20:23:49 GMT
Finally got a response from one of the LSD3 admins: What? What? Did he understand that one of his own members got hit? Do he care? Is LSD 4 big alliances with pacts and "you hit one of us, we all hit back" motto? Should we proced further with this matter? I still haven't heard from coldman, the suspected victim.
|
|
Perun
Public Area Guest
Issa (Vis) [1:76:24]
Posts: 2,506
|
Post by Perun on Aug 22, 2005 20:32:49 GMT
He probably didn't understand. Try explaining again.
But, I urge all of you: don't say anything about out actions anymore to anyone! You don't know what kind of deals other alliances are in.
Secrets about actions and intentions are revealed right before attack, when it's inevitable, just to bring additional surprise and panic in enemy ranks, never before.
|
|
Natmus
Morkin Admin
Fight the power!
Posts: 4,518
|
Post by Natmus on Aug 22, 2005 20:54:14 GMT
Okay, I try to explain once more:
|
|
Freiegeister
Morkin Member
'Blasphemy is a victimless crime' - Dawkins
Posts: 1,126
|
Post by Freiegeister on Aug 22, 2005 23:01:58 GMT
He probably didn't understand. Try explaining again. But, I urge all of you: don't say anything about out actions anymore to anyone! You don't know what kind of deals other alliances are in. Secrets about actions and intentions are revealed right before attack, when it's inevitable, just to bring additional surprise and panic in enemy ranks, never before. Agreed, having seen how big these guys fleets are, we are in no position to challenge even one of them. They appear to have no qualms about preemptively taking down any potential challengers.
|
|
Natmus
Morkin Admin
Fight the power!
Posts: 4,518
|
Post by Natmus on Aug 23, 2005 15:36:39 GMT
Finally an answer:
|
|
|
Post by ashimar on Aug 23, 2005 22:32:55 GMT
One of the responses I got in general from a diplomat of the second largest alliance "Venon Interplay" [.:VI:.] after i on a sidenote mentioned as an example the way some members of [Wraith] behave WITHOUT IMPLYING IT WAS AGAINST SOME OF US AS WELL, went like this:
"Wraith is feared by many, but respected by few"
Still, from what I have recently learned in my sudden exploits as diplomat/agent is that the top 20 alliances (and that goes for individual players as well) like to play it safe when it concerns their peers. We should compare the situation with the principles of M.A.D. (mutual assured destruction) as practised during the cold war.
The very big alliances can (I think) be divided in 2 or 3 camps with some part of both sides (those are the third camp actually - hybrids from an ideological point of view) and although they are ranked they know a war between giants will not benefit them as a third party might step in. Alos it seems there is free traffic of members from time to time leaving one alliances to go to another or to found a new one. Their interpersonal relations make it extremely hard to follow where their allegiances actually lie.
We may think that our quick ascent to the top 100 means something. Well, soberingly it doesn't to the top 20. We are mere ants on the ground. They only notice us when we enter their rankingrealm. Then we become either interesting, or a threat....
One big alliance told me they only make peacetreaties with those they defintely don't want to go to war with and since it is unlikely they will go to war with or expect to be harmed by a smaller alliance like ours, there is nothing to be gained for them to even consider a treaty. The treaties are for them a different thing then they are for us. If they have too many treaties it's to them as if they can't handle their own affairs and need help. They are very aware and leery of a thing like that so they got another reason not to pursue that. So the pursuit of treaties for display is solely an activity the smaller alliances who indeed know or fear they can't handle things themselves dabble in.
Another school of thought among them is the "Less is more" adagium. With more treaties and pacts the total value of having a pact/treaty with them is devaluated. It might look as if ANYONE can be their pal. They are also hghly allergic to those wanting to simply hike oj their reputation and scores, which is undestandable at least.
That's why I too am beginning to believe we should not ad infinitum pursue alliances with everyone. There are simply too many of them and the ones who view our list will loose the general picture, except that we have been prolific negotiators. Then again, the major alliances know it is relatively easy to get small allainces to go along with treaties. It is the way of things in Inselkampf.
What wonder about, if not worry a bit, is how we will discontinue certain treaties when the time comes we seer that we should limit our list instead of expand. For now we accumulate, but soon we may want to start pushing away.
Perhaps having a secondary alliance, not a feeder as that would be against our principles (do we even agree on that I wonder ?), but a sibling group as some of you have already discussed in length, could be used to dump some of the alliances we no longer want on our main list ?
|
|
Freiegeister
Morkin Member
'Blasphemy is a victimless crime' - Dawkins
Posts: 1,126
|
Post by Freiegeister on Aug 23, 2005 23:36:21 GMT
"Wraith is feared by many, but respected by few" Which is amusing as respect is one of the three things they seek as an alliance.
|
|
Perun
Public Area Guest
Issa (Vis) [1:76:24]
Posts: 2,506
|
Post by Perun on Aug 24, 2005 10:07:57 GMT
For nice use of latin vocabulary, Ashimar gets some exaltation!
|
|