Post by soiram on Aug 19, 2005 23:41:24 GMT
I propose the following guidelines for treaties:
1) Ideally diplomats should handle treaties. This means that if a non-diplomat is offered a treaty (s)he could either direct the negotiations to a diplomat or handle it himself, but notify the rest. In any case open a new thread in this forum (is this the right forum or should all treaties be moved to politics instead?)
2) Before agreeing to a treaty, the negotiator should ask the standard question
3) If the answer is positive, then proceed, otherwise let us know in the thread
4) Please write in the thread with whom you negotiated the treaty and who implemented it (if different).
5) A diplomat should then implement the treaty on IK.
6) Check if the other alliance has also implemented the treaty on their page. If not, politely notify them.
Objectios / Suggestions?
1) Ideally diplomats should handle treaties. This means that if a non-diplomat is offered a treaty (s)he could either direct the negotiations to a diplomat or handle it himself, but notify the rest. In any case open a new thread in this forum (is this the right forum or should all treaties be moved to politics instead?)
2) Before agreeing to a treaty, the negotiator should ask the standard question
3) If the answer is positive, then proceed, otherwise let us know in the thread
4) Please write in the thread with whom you negotiated the treaty and who implemented it (if different).
5) A diplomat should then implement the treaty on IK.
6) Check if the other alliance has also implemented the treaty on their page. If not, politely notify them.
Objectios / Suggestions?
