[RICHT] Attack on ouroboro13

[Natmus]

Date: 16.08.2005 09:27
From: ouroboro13
Subject: bah!
Attack report
from 15.08.2005 08:34
Offence Units VALHALLA (1:42:11)
Total Losses
Large Warship 40 0
Large Merchant Ship 10 0
Small Warship 75 1
Small Merchant Ship 25 0
Archer 350 3
Catapult 6 0
Defence Units kumar (1:29:11)
Total Losses
Small Merchant Ship 1 1
Stone Thrower 12 12
Spearfighter 10 10
Plundered Resources
Gold 0
Stone 2368
Lumber 2276
Destruction
Stone Quarry Level 4 (Destruction: 2)
Laboratory Level 3 (Destruction: 2)
Storehouse Level 1 (Destruction: 4)
Stone Wall Level 4 (Destruction: 2)
Watch-Tower Level 3 (Destruction: 2)

[Natmus]

Message
Date: 16.08.2005 10:46
To: RICHT
Subject: Attack on ouroboro13
RICHT,

I'm Natmus, an admin of the [Morkin] alliance. You have attacked on of my alliance members, ouroboro13, recently without any known provocation of any kind from ouroboro13. The only thing he did was to be away during the weekend, and he let his resources accumulate so he could start building again when he returned.

But you did more than raid, you destroyed a lot of buildings, for what purpose I don't know. That goes beyond raiding an inactive isle, I believe.

Would you please contact me with an explanation for this attack at the soonest? If it was a mistake, you may have thought it was an inactive isle with the full stores, we are willing to discuss a fair reparation agreement.

Regards,
Natmus, admin of [Morkin] alliance

[Natmus]

Message
Date: 16.08.2005 10:50
To: RICHT
Subject: Attack on ouroboro13 (2)
Oh, and if you don't know what attack I'm talking about, here's ouroboro13's battle report:

Attack report
from 15.08.2005 08:34
Offence Units VALHALLA (1:42:11)
Total Losses
Large Warship 40 0
Large Merchant Ship 10 0
Small Warship 75 1
Small Merchant Ship 25 0
Archer 350 3
Catapult 6 0
Defence Units kumar (1:29:11)
Total Losses
Small Merchant Ship 1 1
Stone Thrower 12 12
Spearfighter 10 10
Plundered Resources
Gold 0
Stone 2368
Lumber 2276
Destruction
Stone Quarry Level 4 (Destruction: 2)
Laboratory Level 3 (Destruction: 2)
Storehouse Level 1 (Destruction: 4)
Stone Wall Level 4 (Destruction: 2)
Watch-Tower Level 3 (Destruction: 2)

[Ringthane]

Fuckin hell, we can't take this one AND avinalaff at the same time... life is unfair.

I'm sending stones and gold to Alexander right away.

[Natmus]

Message
Date: 16.08.2005 13:42
From: RICHT
Subject: RE: Attack on ouroboro13 (2)
Congrats, its the name of the game, in case you have forgotten

Arse-hole!

What do people think? Should we go on and pester someone in his alliance, or just suck it up for now?

[sparrowhawk]

Another bully. Likely to be in an alliance of bullies. Suck it and wait, I say. Let's not grovel to every Minchione! in IK, or we'd be on the floor for ever...

[Natmus]

Well, I couldn't help make a response anyway:

Message
Date: 16.08.2005 15:53
To: RICHT
Subject: RE: Attack on ouroboro13 (2)
Well, I did ask because a lot of powerful players have an honour-codex that say that they only raid inactive islands, and state that if they by mistake attack an inactive island, they make repairs in full.

But there are different ways to play this game, you are not like that, and that is okay.

But if you don't mind me asking, can I hope you won't attack again? If not, is there any way we can make a deal to avoid further attacks?

Regards
Natmus, [Morkin] admin

[SkulkrinBait]

Fair enough, probably a little runt of a kid who got/is bullied at school so now he has a chance to show how powerful he is by manipulating binary digits in an oh so elegant fashion.

We need to wait again guys, once we are strong enough we can go for avinalaff and this one, whoever is weakest first.

Then we can be the bullies!

[Ringthane]

Having agreed, did you notice how fast one can rise after a proper raiding fleet is set up?

[Natmus]

Message
Date: 16.08.2005 22:22
From: RICHT
Subject: RE: RE: Attack on ouroboro13 (2)
As a rule, I only attack the once, unless they give me a reason to attack again.

And my reply:

Message
Date: 16.08.2005 22:28
To: RICHT
Subject: RE: Attack on ouroboro13 (2)
Well, that is something, I guess. I'll tell the poor guy that he can start rebuilding, and not to give you any reason to attack again

[ouroboro13]

I have time, we have time, plenty of time.