Arminius
Morkin Admin
Ich bin Bl?cher
Posts: 4,148
|
Post by Arminius on Nov 7, 2007 10:15:39 GMT
Yes, without any further details that's far too vague. There are some 500+ people in Digg, and about 100 in Valheru. Chances are that there are some bad apples in both alliances.
|
|
|
Post by aaroom on Nov 7, 2007 19:21:05 GMT
i should think lovely, that it's simply more along the lines that they're been waiting to join pantheon from the start (as they are pact mates) but they see it as more of a benefit to join now for two reasons: the larger isles and fleets will be worn down, making life much easier for them the phycological blow to digg by joining when they did would be tremendous- it would give pantheon a huge boost, whilst pushing digg to their very limits
|
|
blazed
Luxor Member
Posts: 606
|
Post by blazed on Nov 8, 2007 0:06:56 GMT
I'd say thats their thoughts exactly. Whether this is actually true is another matter... i should think lovely, that it's simply more along the lines that they're been waiting to join pantheon from the start (as they are pact mates) but they see it as more of a benefit to join now for two reasons: the larger isles and fleets will be worn down, making life much easier for them the phycological blow to digg by joining when they did would be tremendous- it would give pantheon a huge boost, whilst pushing digg to their very limits
|
|
|
Post by theconqueringworm on Nov 8, 2007 0:43:18 GMT
I should expect that valheru's fleets would be quite large as they're the oldest alliance yet to face a large war.
|
|
McGoogus
Luxor Member
McGorgeous
Posts: 548
|
Post by McGoogus on Nov 8, 2007 1:18:23 GMT
I should expect that valheru's fleets would be quite large as they're the oldest alliance yet to face a large war. Possibly. But who knows what their building habbits were like. Also, the fact that they haven't faced a large war leans towards a large possibility of inexperience. Of course, thats a cynical viewpoint. I haven't experienced major fighting on my front, but I feel I could hold my own, so who knows how this will turn out.
|
|
|
Post by theconqueringworm on Nov 8, 2007 1:23:15 GMT
True, true. I hope valheru makes a difference. I should say that I have nothing really against Digg, but it would be disappointing to see another valiant effort thrown aside. The underdog has got to win sometime, otherwise it's just boring.
|
|
|
Post by aaroom on Nov 8, 2007 21:04:19 GMT
in my oppinion, if digg win this war, the server is over. there will be no threats (other than morkin) that will be great enough to throw aside DIGG and their pactmates EMPIRE, PAIN, . |D:. and E||M even morkin couldnt manage all those this is the war that will end or renew the server
|
|
|
Post by aaroom on Nov 12, 2007 22:31:40 GMT
am i right in hearing that MORKIN are going to war against digg?
|
|
SkulkrinBait
Morkin Admin
Haxx0rs == Suxx0rs! v4
Posts: 6,680
|
Post by SkulkrinBait on Nov 13, 2007 12:02:26 GMT
Where did you hear that? I'm not aware of any plans for Morkin to attack Digg.
|
|
|
Post by theconqueringworm on Nov 13, 2007 22:38:25 GMT
For some reason, aaroom is obsessed with knowing that answer.
|
|
SkulkrinBait
Morkin Admin
Haxx0rs == Suxx0rs! v4
Posts: 6,680
|
Post by SkulkrinBait on Nov 14, 2007 8:14:57 GMT
Is he a spy?
|
|
|
Post by lovelybutterfiy on Nov 14, 2007 14:10:29 GMT
I think he is just being overly curious for the fact of wondering if DIGG will take an attack on HAWK. Aaroom has been a member of HAWK for a long time now.
|
|
SkulkrinBait
Morkin Admin
Haxx0rs == Suxx0rs! v4
Posts: 6,680
|
Post by SkulkrinBait on Nov 14, 2007 17:22:13 GMT
Do you want to drop the pact with Morkin?
|
|
|
Post by aaroom on Nov 16, 2007 23:08:14 GMT
nah mate:) but as you can see, i was right members or morkin have formed MT, who are now at war with DIGG
Posted by theconqueringworm on Nov 13, 2007, 10:38pm For some reason, aaroom is obsessed with knowing that answer. Posted by SkulkrinBait on Nov 14, 2007, 8:14am Is he a spy?
thanks guys dont forget i created HAWK why would i spy on my own alliance?
|
|
|
Post by Arabani on Nov 17, 2007 0:13:38 GMT
Good job defining "traitor" for us.
|
|