[ Rejected ] Epifani

[digital]

1...I find the reputation and size of the alliance as well as the very short peace treaty list quite appealing.

2...My current alliance has grown stagnant, soft, uninvolved, disloyal and catty. If I can't find a new alliance to my liking I will be quitting IK.

3...I've only been in this alliance which is the result of the merger of VI and b3s. I participated in the FOIMP war as it was the only one I was big enough to play in. Most of the few people I would call friends are in E||M. It will be hard to leave them, but at this point, I must. No real enemies to speak of.

4...My play is aggressive. That is not to say that I wish to dominate per se. I simply enjoy wargames. I've played them in some form or another my entire life. When I see something I want-barring any political hinderances- I go after it. In my zeal for war, I sometimes get a bit inconsiderate and impetuous.

5...I've been playing this server since january. I started on the Ik.UK server a couple months before. November I believe. I've since stopped playing there.

6...I'm 41, fem, english speaking. I game a LOT as well as boxing, softball and tennis. Some college, working full time. Not sure whatelse you need to hear after all this. Is KoM a dating service too?

7...I have 4 isles with 483 lws, 59 sws, 5863 stonies, 4704 spears amd 565 archers all in o6.

8...Best moment was definitely kicking FOIMP in the teeth. It was great fun! Worst moment is when I launched an attack fleet and sent 1000 stonies instead of 1000 spears and miscalculated my cata requirements. That wasn't much fun at all.

9...Multis and scripters are cheaters. Something I abhor in all areas, game play especially.

10..Not sure I understand this question but -- I consider pacts to be binding and expect them to be upheld by all parties involved. Peace treaties, I'm less enthusiastic about. Only because I see them as obstacles to expansion.

11...Fine by me. Neither am I. I just want more than 4 islands.

12...I'm quite active. I'm an excellent strategist and really do love planning and executing a good strike.

13...Nothing going on at the moment. My alliance seems to be against having any enemies at all.

14...A pact is a pact and must be upheld. As long as I am not asked to sacrifice more than I can give, I have no qualms with helping anyone in need.

15...No one else has my log in info.

16...No name changes

17...member&id=11573

[englishcheese]

She sounds scary ^^

If KoM is a dating service...hmmmm....

I would need to see a picture before saying yes or no

Bare in mind she is 21 years older than me so I may have to shut my eyes ^^

[Clausewitz]

#4 - Should would need to be "tutored" in the Morkin style. I never considered "taking that which I want" to be a core value...

#7 - I have single islands with better stats than that, and my player ID is 3k higher. Leads me to believe A) she's a terrible player, or B) she's taken some considerable hits over the months.

#11 - Contradicts her own statement in #4.

First-glance observations would lead me to the hunch that she would be a bit of a "project player" that would need some mentoring. I always consider maturity the cornerstone of potential in this game, and she seems to have a fair degree of that.

[SkulkrinBait]

A tentative yes from me, her vital statistics aren't great (I mean her cat count etc) but I do like the idea of having an alliance of people with various different backgrounds.

She'd nee to agree to play in the "peaceful" Morkin style of course.

Plus I have a thing for older women, yes she is even older than I am.

[digital]

I'm with englishcheese on this, she's 20 years older than me and scares the crap out of me!

On a random point me and ruku were in Leeds tonight, around the uni, it's quite a nice place.

[Sol]

lol

I'll give a moderate yes as well. Let everyone have their fresh beginnings....

[eproxy]

Apart from the aggressive nature I'd say yes too. Definately coherant and mature; the two traits I primarily look for. As for her army stats those are probably due to the FOIMP war; a few weeks focusing on LWS production should sort that out.

[Clausewitz]

eproxy said:

Definately coherant

Definitely coherent

I'm not a Spell-Checker, just a healthy appreciation for irony

[AeroS]

This is not a peaceful player. Her app continually mentions her desire for more islands through hostile actions. I don't think she will be happy in our alliance and I am betting she will be a diplomats nightmare a few times a month.
I am saying no.

[Cait_Sith]

Sorry to say I'm with Aero on this one. She doesn't seem the type for a little peaceful expansion.

"I sometimes get a bit inconsiderate and impetuous" (Someone'll need to explain how to quote properly at some point)

Not the best of qualities to have here, but on the bright side she's being honest about it?

And I'm not too sure about "As long as I am not asked to sacrifice more than I can give"... That's all down to oppinion and she could refuse to attack someone because the losses would be too great. Just pointing this out as a possibility, albeit a lesser one considering how hungry for battle she sounds.

[McGoogus]

No from me. She was in my old alliance. Very immature for a 41 yr old. Hardly got along with anyone and failed to see any valid points in any disputes she would cause (a lot). She's far too aggressive for us too and not in the good way. We're peaceful. She's not. Take it from someone with first hand experience. It wouldn't work out.

[Clausewitz]

That's all I needed to hear to make a "no" vote.

[Sol]

Yep. No from me then.

[Arminius]

So not really a good choice of name... according to Wikipedia, epiphany can mean "a practice of evoking, and engaging with mindful contemplation. Breakthrough or transcendent awareness. Profound realization that seems to engage one's whole being in resonant connection with aspects of truth and insight."




Edit: don't think I have to explicitly state that that's a 'no'.

[Warliter]

Can't be bothered to write all the reasons that have already been put above, so just NO